Intervention IP-102: Efficacy of an Internet-Based Depression Intervention to Improve Rates of Treatment in Adolescent Mothers
Summary
The intervention aimed to encourage Black mothers of low SES to seek depression treatment via an internet-based intervention. The intervention included vignettes, questions and answers, and other resources. In two time points, participants answered questions about their attitude and subjective norms towards mental health treatment, perceived control, intention to seek depression evaluation and treatment, and actually receiving treatment. Only the intervention group received the intervention. The intervention led to significant changes in each of these outcomes.
Overview
To test the effectiveness of an internet-based depression intervention on seeking depression treatment
Research-Tested — Interventions with strong methodological rigor that have demonstrated short-term or long-term positive effects on one or more targeted health outcomes to improve minority health and/or health disparities through quantitative measures; Studies have a control or comparison group and are published in a peer-review journal; No pilot, demonstration or feasibility studies.
Intervention Details
Both Community and Academic/Clinical Researchers
Citations:
-
Cynthia Logsdon, M., Myers, J., Rushton, J. et al. Efficacy of an Internet-based depression intervention to improve rates of treatment in adolescent mothers. Arch Womens Ment Health 21, 273–285 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0804-z Link
Relevance: Main Intervention
No
Contact Information
Mimia Cynthia Logsdon
University of Louisville
https://web.archive.org/web/20160123133716/http://kyteenmom.com/sign-up-today
mclogs01@louisville.edu
502-553-8496
Results
Improve minority health or the health of other populations with health disparities (e.g. rural populations, populations with low SES, and sexual and gender minorities)
Rates of depression treatment in adolescents
Attitude and subjective norms towards mental health treatment, perceived control, and intention to seek depression evaluation
Those in the intervention group intended to seek treatment (p=0.003) and actually received treatment (p=0.009) over time when compared to the control group. Within the control group, intention to seek treatment and actual treatment rates did not change (p=0.999 and p=0.081, respectively). Both rates increased over time within the intervention group (p=0.003 and p<0.001, respectively). Scores on two of the instruments (attitude, p=0.041; perceived control, p=0.007) improved significantly more over time for the intervention group when compared to the control group, but subjective norms did not. The scores on the instruments remained consistent over time within the control group (attitude, p=0.841; subjective norms, p=0.784; perceived control, p=0.913), while the scores significantly improved within the intervention group (p=0.018, p=0.040, and p<0.001, respectively).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) techniques were used to test for differences between continuous variables, while Kruskal–Wallis, Fischer’s exact tests, and Wilcoxon methods were used to test for differences among categorical variables as appropriate. Repeated measures ANOVA techniques were used to test if changes occurred over time both within groups and between groups using an adjusted approach.
Evaluations and Assessments
Yes
Process Evaluation: From the intervention group, acceptability ratings of the intervention were as follows: The website is easy to use n =124 (80.8%); an internet website is a good place for me to learn about depression n=108 (70.2%); I can relate to one or more of the stories presented on the homepage n=76 (49.2%); I would recommend this website to another teen mom n=110 (71.5%).
Demographic and Implementation Description
Depression, Women's Health and Pregnancy
African American or Black, White
People with Lower Socioeconomic Status (SES), Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations, Underserved Rural Communities
Adolescents (10 - 17 years), Young Adults (18 - 39 years)
Socio-demographics / Population Characteristics
Rural, Suburban, Urban / Inner City
Unspecified
Female
Unspecified
Kentucky
Low SES
Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework
Levels of Influence | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual | Interpersonal | Community | Societal | ||
Determinant Types | Biological | ||||
Behavioral | ✔ | ||||
Physical / Built Environment | |||||
Sociocultural Environment | |||||
Health Care System | ✔ |
Community Involvement
The community's role in different areas of the Intervention (Choices are "No Role", "Participation", and "Leadership"):
Participation
Participation
Participation
Participation
Participation
Participation
Participation
No Role
Characteristics and Implementation
Behavior Change
Secondary Prevention
Clinic / Health Care Facility, Data for the control group was collected in health care clinics and in home visits. The intervention group used a computer of their choice, which was often located in schools and health care facilities., Schools / Colleges
Online/e-Health
N/A
Conceptual Framework
Theory of Reasoned Action / Planned Behavior
None
Implementation
Quasi-Experimental (does not require random assignment, but requires a comparison/control group with pre and post intervention outcome assessments)
300
292
2013
2016
Intervention Exposures
Less than 1 month
Twice
1-2 Sessions
1-2 Hours
Individual
Grade 4-5
Impact, Lessons, Components
Yes
Attitude (p=0.041) and perceived control (p=0.007) improved significantly more over time for the intervention group when compared to the control group, but subjective norms did not. Dose of the intervention (measured in time spent on the intervention) significantly impacted (increased) attitudes (B=2.00, p=0.029). Being depressed (OR=2.15, 95% CI 1.15–4.04, p=0.005) and exposed to the intervention (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.06–2.32, p=0.012) increased the odds of seeking treatment.
Adequate computer capabilities to support the intervention were critical to success. With the use of other technologies, the availability of adequate cell or wireless service is foundational to success.
Attitude (p=0.041) and perceived control (p=0.007) improved significantly more over time for the intervention group when compared to the control group, but subjective norms did not. Dose of the intervention (measured in time spent on the intervention) significantly impacted (increased) attitudes (B=2.00, p=0.029). Being depressed (OR=2.15, 95% CI 1.15–4.04, p=0.005) and exposed to the intervention (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.06–2.32, p=0.012) increased the odds of seeking treatment.
Lessons Learned
Collaboration and relationships with community leaders are instrumental for meaningful clinical interventions. As technology evolves, it’s important to deliver interventions using the same technology that the population already uses and is interested in.
Insights Gained During Implementation
Insight Category | Insight Description |
---|---|
Cost of Implementing or Sustaining | The intervention was inexpensive to deliver. |
Logistics | It was necessary for investigators to be on site for delivery of intervention, but this will not be the case as technology evolves. |
Staffing | Adequate staffing is needed on site for questionnaire administration. This is true for both intervention and control groups, with manualized training to support both groups. |
Intervention Components
Yes
No
Products, Materials, and Funding
Used for Implementation | Needed for Sustainability | |
---|---|---|
Expertise | ||
Community mobilization, community organization/coalition building |
Yes | Unknown |
Partnerships | ||
Government agencies (city/state/county health department, law enforcement/criminal justice agencies) |
Yes | Unknown |
Funding Sources | ||
Public funding (e.g., federal, state or local government) |
Yes | Yes |
Public funding (e.g., federal, state or local government) |
Yes | No |
Product/Material/Tools
Tailored For Language | Language(s) if other than English | Material | |
---|---|---|---|
Outreach/Recruitment Tools | |||
Informed Consent Form |
No |
N/A | |
Participant Educational Tools | |||
Description of instruments |
No |
Attachment available for request at the bottom of the page. |
|
Measurement Tools | |||
Standardized Instrument/Measures |
No |
Attachment available for request at the bottom of the page. |
Implementation Materials and Products
Material | |
---|---|
Implementation/Delivery Materials | |
No Implementation/Delivery Materials provided. | |
Implementation/Output Materials | |
No Implementation/Output Materials provided. |
Articles Related to Submitted Intervention
Article | |
---|---|
Reports/Monographs | |
No Reports/Monographs provided. | |
Additional Articles | |
No Additional Articles provided. |
Materials Available for Request
- Instruments 12-13-23.docx
- Instruments 12-13-23.docx
- Instruments 12-13-23 (2).docx