Intervention IP-130: Strong African American Families (SAAF) program
Highlights
Hypertension Obesity Type 2 Diabetes
Adolescents (10 - 17 years) Young Adults (18 - 39 years)
Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations Underserved Rural Communities African American or Black
Georgia
The Strong African American Families (SAAF) program is a family-centered, randomized intervention designed to prevent risk behaviors in African American youth by enhancing parental warmth, involvement, and communication. Delivered across seven weekly 2-hour sessions at community facilities in rural Georgia, SAAF significantly reduced metabolic syndrome components at age 25 among youth with high unsupportive parenting at baseline (β=−.17, p=.03). The program also reduced inflammation and catecholamine levels in prior follow-ups. Funded by NICHD and NIDA.
Overview
The purpose of the Strong African American Families (SAAF) program is to prevent risk behaviors in African American youth by enhancing parental warmth, involvement, and communication, with the long-term goal of improving health outcomes.
Research-Tested — Interventions with strong methodological rigor that have demonstrated short-term or long-term positive effects on one or more targeted health outcomes to improve minority health and/or health disparities through quantitative measures; Studies have a control or comparison group and are published in a peer-review journal; No pilot, demonstration or feasibility studies.
Intervention Details
Academic/Clinical Researchers Only
Citations:
-
Brody GH, Kogan SM, Chen YF, McBride Murry V. Long-term effects of the strong African American families program on youths' conduct problems. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2008 Nov;43(5):474-81. Epub 2008 Jul 31. PubMed
PubMed Central
DOI
Relevance: Main Intervention, Post-Intervention Outcomes -
Chen E, Miller GE, Yu T, Brody GH. Unsupportive parenting moderates the effects of family psychosocial intervention on metabolic syndrome in African American youth. International journal of obesity (2005). 2018 Apr;42(4):634-640. Epub 2017 Oct 6. PubMed
PubMed Central
DOI
Relevance: Post-Intervention Outcomes -
Miller GE, Brody GH, Yu T, Chen E. A family-oriented psychosocial intervention reduces inflammation in low-SES African American youth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014 Aug 5;111(31):11287-92. Epub 2014 Jul 21. PubMed
PubMed Central
DOI
Relevance: Post-Intervention Outcomes -
Brody GH, Yu T, Chen E, Miller GE. Prevention moderates associations between family risks and youth catecholamine levels. Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association. 2014 Nov;33(11):1435-9. Epub 2014 Mar 3. PubMed
PubMed Central
DOI
Relevance: Post-Intervention Outcomes -
Brody GH, Chen YF, Kogan SM, Murry VM, Brown AC. Long-term effects of the strong African American families program on youths' alcohol use. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 2010 Apr;78(2):281-5. PubMed
PubMed Central
DOI
Relevance: Post-Intervention Outcomes
No
Contact Information
University of Georgia
Results
-
Improve minority health or the health of other populations with health disparities (e.g. rural populations, populations with low SES)
Intervention Primary Outcome:Number of clinically elevated metabolic syndrome components at age 25, including central adiposity, high blood pressure, high triglycerides, high fasting glucose, and low HDL cholesterol.
Intervention Secondary Outcome:Metabolic syndrome diagnosis (binary), defined as presence of central adiposity plus at least two additional components per International Diabetes Federation guidelines, assessed at age 25.
Key Findings:Among African American youth from low-income rural Georgia, participation in the SAAF family intervention significantly reduced clinically elevated metabolic syndrome components at age 25 for those with high unsupportive parenting at baseline (β=−.17, p=.03; effect size=−.350, SE=0.178). The intervention group had 0.35 fewer elevated metabolic syndrome components than controls among high-risk youth. For metabolic syndrome diagnosis, the interaction was marginally significant (OR=.807, p=.083). Mediation analyses showed that intervention effects were partially explained by improvements in parenting targets (parental involvement, family rules, warmth), with an indirect effect of −0.051 (95% CI: −0.150, −0.003). Effects remained significant after controlling for depression, life stress, and unhealthy behaviors.
Statistical Method Used:Linear and logistic regression models tested interactions between unsupportive parenting and intervention status predicting metabolic syndrome counts and diagnosis. A latent difference score mediation model with nonparametric bootstrapping (1,000 iterations) tested indirect effects via parenting improvements. Johnson-Neyman regions of significance testing identified where groups differed. All models controlled for gender, SES, depression, life stress, and unhealthy behaviors.
-
Reduce health disparities (study must show that health disparities are being measured between a population with health disparities and a reference group)
Intervention Primary Outcome:Reduction in clinically elevated metabolic syndrome components at age 25 among African American youth from low-income rural backgrounds, a population with documented higher rates of metabolic syndrome compared to national averages.
Intervention Secondary Outcome:Metabolic syndrome diagnosis at age 25, defined by International Diabetes Federation criteria, in a population of low-income, rural African American youth disproportionately affected by cardiometabolic disease.
Key Findings:The SAAF family intervention reduced metabolic syndrome risk in low-income rural African American youth, a group with disproportionately high cardiometabolic burden. Among those with high unsupportive parenting at baseline, the intervention significantly reduced clinically elevated metabolic syndrome components at age 25 versus controls (β=−.17, p=.03; effect size=−.350, SE=0.178). The 17.1% metabolic syndrome diagnosis rate observed is comparable to national estimates, suggesting the intervention may help close the disparity gap in this high-risk population. Mediation analyses indicated that improvements in parenting practices (involvement, warmth, family rules) partially accounted for reduced metabolic syndrome risk (indirect effect=−0.051, 95% CI: −0.150, −0.003). Results held after controlling for depression, life stress, and unhealthy behaviors.
Statistical Method Used:Linear and logistic regression models tested interactions between unsupportive parenting and intervention status predicting metabolic syndrome counts and diagnosis. A latent difference score mediation model with nonparametric bootstrapping (1,000 iterations) tested indirect effects via parenting improvements. Johnson-Neyman regions of significance testing identified where groups differed. All models controlled for gender, SES, depression, life stress, and unhealthy behaviors.
Evaluations and Assessments
No
Demographic and Implementation Description
Hypertension, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes
African American or Black
Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations, Underserved Rural Communities
Adolescents (10 - 17 years), Young Adults (18 - 39 years)
Socio-demographics / Population Characteristics
Rural
Unspecified
Georgia
Unspecified
Research Framework
| Levels of Influence | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | Interpersonal | Community | Societal | ||
| Determinant Types | Biological | ✔ | |||
| Behavioral | ✔ | ✔ | |||
| Physical / Built Environment | |||||
| Sociocultural Environment | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||
| Health Care System | |||||
Community Involvement
The community's role in different areas of the Intervention (Choices are "No Role", "Participation", and "Leadership"):
No Role
No Role
No Role
Participation
Participation
No Role
Participation
No Role
Characteristics and Implementation
Behavior Change, Quality Improvement or Organizational Change
Primary Prevention, Secondary Prevention
Home, Local Community (e.g. Barbershops, Beauty / Hair Salon, Laundromats, Food Markets, Community Centers)
In-person
Community Health Worker/Promoters, Health Educator
Conceptual Framework
Social Cognitive / Social Learning Theory, Social Norms Theory
Community Organization / Community Building, Social Ecological Model
Implementation
Individual Randomized Controlled Trial/Comparative (requires random assignment, a control/comparison group, and pre and post intervention outcome assessments)
391
391
2001
2015
Intervention Exposures
More than 5 years
Weekly
7-8 Sessions
1-2 Hours
Group (e.g. Community leaders), Individual
Unspecified
Impact, Lessons, Components
Yes
The SAAF intervention previously documented reductions in pro-inflammatory cytokines (age 19) and catecholamine levels (age 20) in those with high unsupportive parenting. The program also demonstrated long-term prevention of alcohol/drug use initiation, reduction of conduct problems, and enhancement of protective parenting practices and youth self-regulatory capabilities.
Targeting developmentally appropriate, protective parenting practices; imparting self-regulatory skills during preadolescence; using trained community facilitators from the same cultural background as participants.
Lessons Learned
Not available
Insights Gained During Implementation
No insights available.
Intervention Components
Yes
No
Products, Materials, and Funding
To request SAAF program materials contact the Center for Family Research at the University of Georgia (cfruga@uga.edu).
| Used for Implementation | Needed for Sustainability | |
|---|---|---|
| Expertise | ||
|
Research/Data science |
Yes | Yes |
|
Community mobilization, community organization/coalition building |
Yes | Yes |
|
Health Education / Health Literacy |
Yes | Yes |
|
Clinical Care |
Yes | Unknown |
| Partnerships | ||
|
Universities |
Yes | Yes |
|
Community groups (e.g. faith-based organizations, barbershops, beauty-salons, laundromats, food markets, community centers, cultural associations, tribal groups) |
Yes | Yes |
|
Government agencies (city/state/county health department, law enforcement/criminal justice agencies) |
Yes | Unknown |
| Funding Sources | ||
|
Public funding (e.g., federal, state or local government) |
Yes | Unknown |
Product/Material/Tools
| Tailored For Language | Language(s) if other than English | Material | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outreach/Recruitment Tools | |||
|
Publicity Materials (e.g. Posters, Flyers, Press Releases) |
No |
https://cfr.uga.edu/
|
|
|
Informed Consent Form |
No |
https://cfr.uga.edu/
|
|
| Participant Educational Tools | |||
|
Brochures/Factsheets/Pamphlets |
No |
https://cfr.uga.edu/
|
|
|
Parent and youth skill-building curricula and family curriculum |
No |
To request SAAF program materials contact the Center for Family Research at the University of Georgia (cfruga@uga.edu). |
|
| Measurement Tools | |||
|
Standardized Instrument/Measures |
No |
To request SAAF program materials contact the Center for Family Research at the University of Georgia (cfruga@uga.edu). |
|
Implementation Materials and Products
| Material | |
|---|---|
| Implementation/Delivery Materials | |
|
Coordinator or Facilitator’s Guides, Curricula |
To request SAAF program materials contact the Center for Family Research at the University of Georgia (cfruga@uga.edu). |
| Implementation/Output Materials | |
|
Best Practice Guidelines |
To request SAAF program materials contact the Center for Family Research at the University of Georgia (cfruga@uga.edu). |
Articles Related to Submitted Intervention
| Article | |
|---|---|
| Reports/Monographs | |
|
Methodology, Evaluation |
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00713.x
|
|
Methodology, Evaluation |
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.2.356
|
| Additional Articles | |
|
Evaluation |
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406578111
|
|
Evaluation |
https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000072
|
